Motion Reference 03

Since dA had authorized the psychotic 's slanders, I have to submit all of my art to photo category and explain not stolen thing to alleviate reputational risk.
But such wrong categorizing made other people troubled, and some kind people advised I should to submit to right category.
So I will submit correctly by common logical order with explaining situation, unless dA shows local rules clearly.

Because that madness is too unusual, some people are misunderstanding as I am a real thief.
Outsiders might not know our situations.
Therefore see only this. - [link]

This comment is claiming my digital art is photomanip, with no causes. (and blaming me about the action of someone that unrelated to me.)
(In fact, I submitted some of my arts as photography, because photomanip might brings more misunderstandings.)
I told about actual creating process of my digital art twice till that.
Furthermore. I do not know whom she is talking about.

And it seems these pretexts are caused by I didn't explain about I am not a thief on each pages. It must be meaning most of creators are thief even if their works were quite original.
Her slanders are always incongruous like that. Quite pathologic delusions.
But deviantART is assisting such insane slanders.

I know such deviated description must be annoy.
But they are blaming me as offender because I didn't describe about ''I am not thief. And didn't something other violations.'' when submitted.
Then, I have to explain all about my innocence, it must become too long like encyclopaedia.
Who is doing such silly act?
!!! They spoke no truth at all. Don't believe. !!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The main model of this was Golden Eagle.
But I referred many birds of prey.

GIF animations
[link]
[link]